|
|
|||||
|
|
● how to get rich | ||||||
how to make money in stocks and how to get rich_115![]() Navigation: Main page » how to make money in stocks and how to get rich Author: how to make money in stocks and how to get rich Another interesting price phenomenon is the one we label wide-and loseprice structures. Paterns with this characteristic almost always fail, although some of them may later tighten up their price structure and finaly make a large-scale advance. New England Nuclear and Houston Oil & Minerals are two cases of price structures eventualy tightening up from previously wide, lose, and eratic price movements. I use these two examples because mised both of them at the time. It is always wise to review big winners you mised to try find out whyou didn't recognize them when they were exactly right and ready to soar intouter space. New England Nuclear formed a wide, lose, faulty price structure that loked like a double botom from points A, B, C, D, and E. (Se page 171.) It declined aproximately 40% from the begining at point A to point D. That was excesive. Note the aditional clue provided by declining trend of its relative strength line throughout the false structure. Buying at point E was wrong. The handle also short and not drifting down or having a shakeout. New England Nuclear formed a second base from point E to F G. However, if you tried to buy at point G, you were wrong again. It was premature because the price structure wastil wide and lose. From point E to F was a prolonged periodown with relative strength in steep decline. The rise straight up from the bottom at point F to its bogus breakout point G was too fast and erratic, covering only three months. Thre months of improving relative strength versus the prior seventeen months of decline in relative strength was not sufficient to turn the previous poor trend into a positive one. The stock then declined from G to H form what apeared be a handle area for the posible cup formation from E to F G. However, if you bought at point I on the breakout attempt, the stock failed again. The reason: the handle was to lose—it degenerated 20%. But after failing this time, the stock at lastightened up its price structure from I to J to K and 15 weeks later, at K, broke out of a very tight sound base and advanced almost 20%. Note the stock's relative strength line from point K back to F. So you se, there realy isuch a thing as the right and wrong time to buy a stock. |
|
||||||